Skip to content

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
    • Help
    • Support
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
scriptorium
scriptorium
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 24
    • Issues 24
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
  • degrowth
  • scriptoriumscriptorium
  • Issues
  • #211

Closed
Open
Opened Dec 29, 2017 by Viktoriya@viktoriya.kulikova3 of 3 tasks completed3/3 tasks
  • Report abuse
  • New issue
Report abuse New issue

Content coherence in review process

  • Regional contextualisation (in the review rating section) does not fit our conference concept - this needs to be deleted completely
  • Please assess on scale 1-5 how relevant the proposal is to the conference theme (1-12) under which it is submitted - better to use just "the conference themes", numbers (1-12) are not needed especially considering the 22 themes and more being discussed at the conference
  • Statistics are missing Poster presentations and Special sessions, the total number does not much
Edited Jan 29, 2018 by Gualter
Assignee
Assign to
Malmo 2018 I
Milestone
Malmo 2018 I
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
0
Labels
None
Assign labels
  • View project labels
Reference: degrowth/scriptorium#211