Criterion of 'coherence' in review of Individual Papers and Posters
The review criteria for IPs and posters also include the criterion 'coherence' (the last criterion in the list) asking for marks 1-5 for how well individual contributions within a (special) session fit together. This is not a relevant criterion for IPs and posters. Though it is too late to exclude it now, it might be good exclude contributions of the marks on this criterion to the overall score of the IP and poster submission. that will be more fair, given divergent understanding of the irrelevant criterion that reviewers migth have applied in giving their mark.