Graphical represenation of examples does not match code
I was particularly looking at: https://valueflo.ws/examples/ex-planning.html#proposal-for-work-commitment
In the graph its written
intent to find someone to work, and in the code the corresponding name of the intent is
Help with R&D for the sensor.
I suppose the reciprocal intent to the provision of cash is not the finding of the fitting person, but the work that dude is doing.
The graphical representation of the proposal is
Proposal: request for work and the name in the code is
Electrochemical engineering skills. That are different abstraction levels, but I think that fits anyway.
I would find it generally useful to use the names of the classes in the code as labels in the graph.
Income distribution agreement has no representation as code. The explanation of this in the text only makes little sense to me, as I think the agreement can only happen when two persons agreed to the proposal. Propably the sense ahall be, that the agreement is guided by previously established value equations.