Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • V valueflows
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 41
    • Issues 41
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 6
    • Merge requests 6
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Value Flows
  • valueflows
  • Merge requests
  • !470

Closed
Created Mar 24, 2019 by Lynn Foster@lynnfosterOwner
  • Report abuse
Report abuse

simpler time format

  • Overview 27
  • Commits 1
  • Changes 1

Trying to get the time formatting nailed down so I can get it properly into the graphql reference. This is in some of your examples @elf-pavlik but I'm not sure it is valid owl/rdf, assuming the time: is in the context? I hope so, I like it....

Other question: How would we do an instant? Would we just need both properties hasBeginning and hasEnd? Or can we get away with one or the other? Or would we need something different? I think you answered some of this somewhere, but I have looked and can't find it.

And one more: Is our rdfs:range still correct for this example? Like here:

vf:observedTime a           owl:ObjectProperty ;
        rdfs:label          "observed time" ;
        rdfs:domain         vf:EconomicEvent ;
        rdfs:range          time:TemporalEntity ;
        vs:term_status      "unstable" ;
        rdfs:comment        "The actual temporal instant or interval." .
Assignee
Assign to
Reviewer
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: time-names