IPs don't have any peer reviews - status session_finished
35 IPs don't have any peer reviews. Another social failure. options:
- Mladen goes in CfP interface as admin and gives them all at least 1 PR. A lot of work and responsibility on Mladen
- CfP interface for peer review is open to all orgas. at the moment orgas who did not submit IPs cannot perfrom any PRs through CfP. Better option and less responsibility on Mladen as one person.
- they only receive ER and the average rating is calculated from the average ERs received. Average rating=sum of ER marks/number of ERs
Such papers would have to move to the Undecided status with minimum 2 ERs received.
Maybe more systemic solution for this issue and issue #137 (closed) is to allow Undecided status to any IP that has minimum 1 ER. The average rating and the formula for calculating it should then work around the issue of wighting and bias. Please advise