... | @@ -15,13 +15,17 @@ https://github.com/valueflows/valueflows/issues/45 |
... | @@ -15,13 +15,17 @@ https://github.com/valueflows/valueflows/issues/45 |
|
|
|
|
|
https://github.com/valueflows/valueflows/issues/52
|
|
https://github.com/valueflows/valueflows/issues/52
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### several questions on how to handle relationships and their "types"
|
|
#### types of relationships: existing vocab vs user defined types of relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note some of these could be separated, but they also affect each other. Also note I use the term relationship type because I don't know what else to call the meta-data-ish thing that is not the relationship itself, no other implications.
|
|
https://github.com/valueflows/agent/issues/38
|
|
* is a relationship one or two objects: are the 2 directions separated?
|
|
|
|
* do relationships live by themselves, or with an agent, or both? (and consider agents in a relationship whose data lives in different places) (and how do we discover relationships of an agent?) https://github.com/valueflows/valueflows/issues/59 https://github.com/valueflows/agent/issues/45
|
|
#### subclasses of Agent, which to support and which to use existing vocab for
|
|
* how do we handle relationship types that are already in existing vocabs vs relationship types that are user defined? (and what do we need for pre-defined types of relationship types?) https://github.com/valueflows/agent/issues/38
|
|
|
|
* owl:inverseOf (above), also @reverse
|
|
https://github.com/valueflows/agent/issues/51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### do relationships live by themselves, or with an agent, or both?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://github.com/valueflows/valueflows/issues/59 https://github.com/valueflows/agent/issues/45
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### separation of concerns
|
|
#### separation of concerns
|
|
|
|
|
... | | ... | |