|
https://pad.co-munity.net/p/20151026-bp2016skype
|
|
# Skype
|
|
I just leave this link for me to be able to find it again. |
|
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |
|
with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> * Mladen
|
|
|
|
* Gualter
|
|
|
|
* Robert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> 26th of October 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Resource | Path |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|Conference Organisation Backend:| `89.12.19.111:3000`|
|
|
|
|
|Call for Participation:| `http://89.12.19.111:3000/en/tc/cfp`|
|
|
|
|
|Login Information: | `admin@example.org` `test123` in both cases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### CfP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ~~Submit new event > Submit session/paper~~
|
|
|
|
* Event type:
|
|
|
|
* ~~Research in Action Special Session~~
|
|
|
|
* ~~Academic Special Session~~
|
|
|
|
* Paper (abstract) [after January?]
|
|
|
|
* Decentralized (spring)?
|
|
|
|
* ~~Track > Themes~~
|
|
|
|
* Themes narrative: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Xcn_VOQ6TSHbFc3jJ8sjRkBPNzsK7a2iGZZK122H3eQ/edit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> 1. The un-common sense
|
|
|
|
1. Historical socialism and post-socialism in Eastern Europe
|
|
|
|
1. Exit from growth ≠ exit from capitalism?
|
|
|
|
1. Degrowth 2016 in context
|
|
|
|
1. Environmentally sound economies
|
|
|
|
1. This is the 22nd century
|
|
|
|
1. Global village
|
|
|
|
1. The wrong way round
|
|
|
|
1. New forms of democracy and new institutions
|
|
|
|
1. Degrowth and other social movements
|
|
|
|
1. Building on solidarity
|
|
|
|
1. Empowering communities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> * Subcategories:
|
|
|
|
1. Work
|
|
|
|
2. Infrastructure/cities
|
|
|
|
3. Transport, mobility
|
|
|
|
4. Democracy political decision-making
|
|
|
|
5. Wealth/income/distribution
|
|
|
|
6. Commons
|
|
|
|
7. Finance/currencies, trade
|
|
|
|
8. Agriculture
|
|
|
|
9. Energy
|
|
|
|
10. Consumption and advertising
|
|
|
|
11. Social systems
|
|
|
|
12. Social limits of growth, well-being and good life
|
|
|
|
13. Environmental limits to growth and North-South environmental conflicts
|
|
|
|
14. Social enterpries, commoperatives and the solidarity economy
|
|
|
|
15. Technology/ICT
|
|
|
|
16. Gender
|
|
|
|
* Remove language - Default to English
|
|
|
|
* Remove logo upload
|
|
|
|
* Make abstract field bigger, while limiting input size
|
|
|
|
* Default sessions length to 1.5 hours, 30 minutes for indivual papers
|
|
|
|
* Wizard for going through the different types of submission, exposing or blending fields accordingly
|
|
|
|
* also make the submission of People appear directly after the event is sent
|
|
|
|
* Abstracts for Contributers to a special session go into the description field. Adjust captions in wizard :)
|
|
|
|
* Allow more people to be added without coming back to main screen (e.g. button add one more person?)
|
|
|
|
* People "Public name" > "Name" (or First Name, Last Name)
|
|
|
|
* "People" > "Contributors"
|
|
|
|
* Allow draft submissions to be saved, and restrict editing of submitted sessions -> Mark a submission as "finished" and restrict editing
|
|
|
|
Mark all unfinished submissions as finished on a certain date (please tell me the date!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Review Process
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Reviewers can see papers/session submitted to the subcategories that he's indicated to be related to
|
|
|
|
* Reviewers can be added to multiple subcategories by the conference organisers
|
|
|
|
* Assignment/relation is done by the inner circle - by hand
|
|
|
|
* Allow Reviewers to pick a submission to review to make it impossible for others to review. When two people "reserved" a session, it can not be "checked out" any longer
|
|
|
|
* When 2 people have reviewed, session is hidden from reviewers interface and can't be reviewed any further
|
|
|
|
* (High Prio): Restrict Self-Review
|
|
|
|
* (Mid Prio) : Alert on divergent reviews - mark them! Either ride piggyback on the Alert/Conflict System or sent out an e-mail after second review if a divergence is being detected
|
|
|
|
* (Low Prio) : Make it possible to mass-mail a group of reviewers from the system
|
|
|
|
* (Low Prio) : Hide the Names associated to a session from the "Outer Circle" to allow for blind review
|
|
|
|
* (Later): Reject a submission if at least one of the minimum requirements is not met
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Research-in-Action Special Session Review
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check [the source pad](https://pad.co-munity.net/p/20151026-bp2016skype) for detailed designs for the questionaires.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Questions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* SSL certificate for *.budapest.degrowth.org?
|
|
|
|
* Is special session button to stay, or rather only dropdown to choose?
|
|
|
|
* Can the event type be a radio instead of dropdown?
|
|
|
|
* One or multiple subcategories to choose?
|
|
|
|
* Reviewers and subcategories?
|
|
|
|
* Is it possible to limit the number of words/characters on thefield? Yes, it is!
|
|
|
|
* 2 separate processes? Scientific sessions only reviewed by scientific committee ; Action sessions only reviewed by peers >> requires decision from organisation |
|
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |